Tanner v. Caplin & Drysdale
C06.41277; 24 F.3d 874 (1994)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. In this legal malpractice suit, plaintiff William B. Tanner appeals the District Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, the law firm of Caplin & Drysdale and three of its attorneys.1 On appeal, plaintiff argues that the District Court erred in ruling that plaintiff's expert opinion testimony was insufficient as a matter of law to prove that plaintiff suffered damages as a result of defendants' alleged malpractice. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. I.