Taylor v. Solis Taylor v. Solis

Taylor v. Solis

571 F.3D 1313, 106 FAIR EMPL.PRAC.CAS. (BNA) 1121, 92 EMPL. PRAC. DEC. P 43,608, 2009.CDC.0000148

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Ruby Taylor, an African-American woman, sued her employer, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming her supervisors sexually harassed her to the point of creating a hostile work environment and, when she complained, retaliated against her. The district court granted summary judgment to the Corporation because it concluded, as a matter of law, (1) the employer had an affirmative defense to Taylors claim of sexual harassment and, (2) with regard to retaliation, Taylor (a) had not offered a prima facie showing that her protected activity caused most of the alleged acts of retaliation, (b) had failed to show one such act was a materially adverse action, and (c) had failed to rebut the Corporations nondiscriminatory explanation of another. We affirm, holding as a matter of law that the PBGC has an affirmative defense to the claim of sexual harassment and that Taylor has failed to meet her burden regarding the claim of retaliation.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2009
10 July
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
43
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
79.2
KB

More Books by Arizona Court of Appeals

State v. Superior Court State v. Superior Court
1996
Fisher v. Kaufman Fisher v. Kaufman
2001
State v. Seyrafi State v. Seyrafi
2001
In re Marriage of Dorman In re Marriage of Dorman
2000
Michael J. v. Michael J Michael J. v. Michael J
2000
State Ex Rel. Mcdougall v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa State Ex Rel. Mcdougall v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa
1997