Teselle v. Mcloughlin
92 CAL.RPTR.3D 696, 173 CAL.APP.4TH 156, 2009 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 5745, 09 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 4913, 2009.CA.0003376
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
This case illustrates the primacy of the complaint in measuring the materiality of the facts which a motion for summary judgment must address. It involves the relationships of at least four subdivisions of the summary judgment statute. (Code Civ. Proc., 437c, subds. (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3) and (p)(2).)