[U] General Casualty Co. Of Wisconsin V. Collins

¶1. Susan and Ryan Collins appeal from a judgment giving effect to a reducing clause in an endorsement for underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in a commercial automobile policy issued by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin to the Collinses. The Collinses argue that the reducing clause is contextually ambiguous and, therefore, they are entitled to the maximum UIM benefit of $100,000. We agree and reverse the judgment and remand the matter for entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.