United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Hanover Insurance Co. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Hanover Insurance Co.

United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Hanover Insurance Co‪.‬

1990.CA.41143 266 CAL. RPTR. 231; 217 CAL. APP. 3D 925

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Plaintiffs North State Development Company (North State) and A. D. Seeno Construction Company (Seeno) appeal from the judgment dismissing their case after a demurrer was sustained to their third amended mandamus petition challenging the imposition of a "school facilities fee" on new residential construction by defendant Pittsburg Unified School District (the District). We conclude the trial court erred in applying the statute of limitations contained in Government Code section 54995 in sustaining the demurrer to a portion of the petition. We hold that sections 66008 and 66017 provide the procedures for challenging the fee imposed, which plaintiffs failed to follow. We affirm the judgment.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1990
31 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
27
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
81.8
KB

More Books by Third Appellate District Court of Appeal of California

Fuhrman v. California Satellite Systems Fuhrman v. California Satellite Systems
1986
Pan v. State Personnel Board Pan v. State Personnel Board
1986
People v. Parrott People v. Parrott
1986
Freeman v. Lind Freeman v. Lind
1986
Keating v. Preston Keating v. Preston
1940
People v. Webb People v. Webb
1986