Vance Riddle and Lucinda Riddle v. Mclouth
1992.MI.1534 , 485 N.W.2D 676, 440 MICH. 85
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
We granted leave to consider a premises owners duty to warn invitees of known or obvious dangers and to determine (1) whether the trial court correctly instructed the jury that, pursuant to SJI2d 19.03, a premises owner must warn an invitee of known or obvious dangers; and (2) whether the jury instruction on violation of a safety regulation pursuant to SJI2d 12.05 constituted error requiring reversal. We conclude that the jury instructions given do not accurately set out the duty of a premises owner. Accordingly, we reverse the decisions of the lower courts and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.