Vance v. Union Planters Corp. Vance v. Union Planters Corp.

Vance v. Union Planters Corp‪.‬

209 F.3d 438, 2000.C05.0042227 , 82 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1199, Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1199(82 Fair Empl)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Yvonne Vance sued Union Planters Bank, N.A. (""Union Planters""), under title VII, alleging discriminatory failure to promote on the basis of sex. A jury awarded $30,000 for lost wages and benefits, $20,000 for emotional distress, and $390,000 in punitive damages. The district court later reduced the total amount awarded to $330,000 because of title VII's statutory limits on employer liability. Union Planters appealed, asserting that (1) no reasonable jury could have found sex discrimination, (2) the court erred in allowing the jury to hear evidence that Union Planters had previously been found to have violated the Equal Pay Act, and (3) the district court erroneously determined Union Planters's size for purposes of the statutory liability limits. We affirm with regard to the first two issues and vacate and remand on the third issue. I.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
25 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
20
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
71.4
KB

More Books by Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Littles v. Board of Pardons and Paroles Division Littles v. Board of Pardons and Paroles Division
1995
Meadowbriar Home for Children Inc. v. Gunn Meadowbriar Home for Children Inc. v. Gunn
1996
Ingalls Shipbuilding Inc. v. Director Ingalls Shipbuilding Inc. v. Director
1995
United States v. Neely United States v. Neely
2003
Dickerson v. Bailey Dickerson v. Bailey
2003
Illinois Central Railraod Comapny v. Dupont Illinois Central Railraod Comapny v. Dupont
2003