Vanstelle v. Macaskill Vanstelle v. Macaskill

Vanstelle v. Macaskill

255 Mich.App. 1, 662 N.W.2d 41, MI.0000044(2003)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

FOR PUBLICATION Both cases in these consolidated appeals raise the legal issue of ostensible agency in a medical office setting. In Docket No. 229123, defendants St. John Health System - Detroit-Macomb Campus, doing business as St. John Riverview Hospital and Medical Center (St. John Riverview Hospital), Riverview Medical Offices (Riverview Medical), and Detroit Riverview Hospital (Riverview Hospital) (hereinafter collectively referred to as ""the Riverview defendants"") appeal by leave granted the circuit court's order denying their motion for summary disposition. In Docket No. 236435, defendants St. John Health Systems (St. John HS) and St. John Hospital and Medical Center (St. John Hospital) (hereinafter collectively referred to as ""the St. John defendants"") appeal by leave granted the circuit court's order denying their motion for summary disposition. We reverse.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
14 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.2
KB

More Books by Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Compeau People v. Compeau
2001
People v. Pesquera People v. Pesquera
2001
Nations Banc Mortgage Corporation of Georgia v. Luptak Nations Banc Mortgage Corporation of Georgia v. Luptak
2000
People v. Canales People v. Canales
2000
Bell v. Seabury Bell v. Seabury
2000
People v. Woods People v. Woods
2000