VoiceStream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc‪.‬

Appellant RPC Properties, Inc. (RPC) brought a motion seeking enforcement of a settlement agreement with VoiceStream Minneapolis, Inc., d/b/a T-Mobile (T-Mobile). Although the district court granted RPC?s request for enforcement and for attorney fees related to the motion, it remained silent as to RPC?s request for damages allegedly arising out of T-Mobile?s delay in performing under the settlement agreement. RPC appealed, asking for an explicit ruling on damages, and the court of appeals concluded that silence was equivalent to a denial of the request. VoiceStream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Props., Inc., 2007 WL 509621, at *2 (Minn. App. Feb. 20, 2007). We reverse and remand to the district court.