![Washington V. Hill](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Washington V. Hill](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Washington V. Hill
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Dennis Hill appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. His automobile was stopped for defective equipment; thereafter the passenger was arrested, and the vehicle was impounded because of defective equipment. He contends the impoundment was pretext for a general exploratory search; was not a legitimate community caretaking function of the troopers; and was unauthorized by statute, especially when the troopers did not consider the alternatives.*fn1 The State contends the court may affirm the search under either the impoundment or search incident to arrest rationales.