Young Mines Co. V. Citizens'' State Bank Young Mines Co. V. Citizens'' State Bank

Young Mines Co. V. Citizens'' State Bank

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

A motion for a new trial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and if granted, every presumption is in favor of the action of such court. Power v. Fairbanks, 146 Cal. 611, 80 P. 1075; 4 C.J. 782, and note. Where an order granting a motion for a new trial is general in its terms, it will be affirmed if it could properly have been granted on any of the grounds assigned. Huntsman v. First Nat. Bank, 29 Ariz. 574, 243 P. 598. When, however, the court specifies in its order the precise reasons it was granted, we are necessarily confined to those reasons in passing upon the order. Millar v. Madison Car Co., 130 Mo. 517, 31 S.W. 574; Anderson v. Chrisman, 37 Okl. 73, 130 P. 539.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1931
18 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
10
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
63.8
KB

More Books by Arizona Supreme Court

Swanson v. Image Bank Swanson v. Image Bank
2003
Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole
1995
Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp. Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.
1995
Sohl v. Winkler Sohl v. Winkler
1994
Matter of Evans Matter of Evans
1995
Wagenseller V. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital Wagenseller V. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital
1985