Frase v. Gourley Frase v. Gourley

Frase v. Gourley

85 Cal.App.4th 762, 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 432, 2000.CA.0042940, 00 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10, 098, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13, 483

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suspended Stuart Frase's driver's license following an administrative per se hearing.
When Frase challenged the suspension in court, the DMV was unable to file the complete administrative record because it had
lost a portion of the hearing-the testimony of Frase and his expert-and refused to bear the cost of reconstructing it. We
affirm the judgment setting aside the suspension.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
19 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
5
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
58.1
KB

More Books by California Court of Appeals

People v. Crayton People v. Crayton
1999
Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400 Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400
1999
Ali v. City of Los Angeles Ali v. City of Los Angeles
1999
County of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
1999
County of Orange v. Carl D. County of Orange v. Carl D.
1999
Boehm & Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Boehm & Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
1999

Customers Also Bought

State v. Granville State v. Granville
2006
Mest v. Cabot Corp. Mest v. Cabot Corp.
2006
F/V American Eagle v. State Alaska F/V American Eagle v. State Alaska
1980
Ex Parte Woodrow Seals Ex Parte Woodrow Seals
1953
[U] In Re Application Of The City Of New York [U] In Re Application Of The City Of New York
2005
Milton Paul Huff v. Patsy Ann Huff Milton Paul Huff v. Patsy Ann Huff
1983