In re Marshall In re Marshall

In re Marshall

392 F.3d 1118, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 36, 44 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 14, 5 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8, C09.0001601(2004)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The surviving spouse alleges that E. Pierce Marshall tortiously interfered with an expected inter vivos gift from the decedent.
Three courts-the Texas probate court, the U.S. bankruptcy court and the U.S. district court-have rendered conflicting judgments
that decide the claims of the surviving spouse and that affect the distribution of the net property of the decedent's trust
and probate estate.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
30 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
41
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
76.8
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. $390 047.55 In U.s. Currency United States v. $390 047.55 In U.s. Currency
1993
United States v. Cochrane United States v. Cochrane
1993
Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004
Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
2005