In re Marshall
392 F.3d 1118, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 36, 44 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 14, 5 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8, C09.0001601(2004)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
The surviving spouse alleges that E. Pierce Marshall tortiously interfered with an expected inter vivos gift from the decedent.
Three courts-the Texas probate court, the U.S. bankruptcy court and the U.S. district court-have rendered conflicting judgments
that decide the claims of the surviving spouse and that affect the distribution of the net property of the decedent's trust
and probate estate.