Barber v. Weber Barber v. Weber

Barber v. Weber

715 N.W.2D 683, 292 WIS.2D 426, 2006 WI APP 88, 2006.WI.0000309

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

1 Mary and Ken Weber appeal from an order granting summary judgment to Platt and Charlotte Barber. The Webers contend that the final decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding the legality of their business use of certain property is determinative and cannot be "superceded" by the circuit court other than on certiorari review. The Webers also challenge the order on grounds of laches and estoppel. In essence, the Webers primary argument recites the doctrine of claim preclusion, which stands for the proposition that "a final judgment on the merits in one action bars parties from relitigating any claim that arises out of the same relevant facts, transactions, or occurrences." Kruckenberg v. Harvey, 2005 WI 43, 19, 279 Wis. 2d 520, 694 N.W.2d 879. We agree with the Webers that the Barbers are precluded from relitigating their claims in circuit court; therefore, we reverse the order granting summary judgment to the the Barbers.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2006
29 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
10
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59.6
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Wyoming

Roemer Oil Co. v. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp. Roemer Oil Co. v. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp.
1994
Amoco v. Bd. of Com'Rs of Carbon County Amoco v. Bd. of Com'Rs of Carbon County
1994
Smith, Keller & Assoc. v. Dorr & Assoc. Smith, Keller & Assoc. v. Dorr & Assoc.
1994
Wyoming Coalition v. Game & Fish Com'n Wyoming Coalition v. Game & Fish Com'n
1994
Boyd v. State Boyd v. State
1987
Davis v. Consolidated Oil & Gas Davis v. Consolidated Oil & Gas
1990