Barber v. Williams Barber v. Williams

Barber v. Williams

244 Kan. 318, 767 P.2d 1284, KS.0042012(1989)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The opinion of the court was delivered by The plaintiff, Dorothy Barber, brought this action for damages
against Sylvia and Laura Williams. Plaintiff later amended her
petition, naming the City of Topeka as an additional defendant.
Judgment has been entered for plaintiff and against Sylvia and
Laura Williams. That judgment is final, and neither Sylvia nor
Laura are parties to this appeal. Plaintiff claims that her
damages were caused by the City's negligence in licensing a
fortunetelling business operated by the Williamses. The trial
court entered summary judgment on plaintiff's claims against the
City of Topeka, and she appeals. It will be helpful to first state some of the rules relating to
summary judgment. In Meyers v. Grubaugh, 242 Kan. 716, 717-18,
750 P.2d 1031 (1988), we said:

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1989
20 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
56.3
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Kansas

Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs
1996
In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks
1996
Gillespie v. Seymour Gillespie v. Seymour
1991
Bair v. Peck Bair v. Peck
1991
Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986