Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

1975.C09.40586 511 F.2D 1200

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The Arizona Board of Regents and its members appeal from a judgment ordering the regents to reinstate Morris J. Starsky as an assistant professor of philosophy at Arizona State University. Starsky brought this action for an injunction and damages under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981-85, alleging that the Boards decision not to renew his yearly contract violated his first amendment rights. The trial court held that the regents improperly predicated the decision not to renew on constitutionally protected speech. Starsky v. Williams, D.Ariz., 1972, 353 F. Supp. 900. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand on a limited issue.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1975
5 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
65.5
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Cochrane United States v. Cochrane
1993
Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004
In re Marshall In re Marshall
2004
Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
2005