![California Union Insurance Co. v. Trinity River Land Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![California Union Insurance Co. v. Trinity River Land Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
California Union Insurance Co. v. Trinity River Land Co.
1980.CA.40944 163 CAL. RPTR. 802; 105 CAL. APP. 3D 104
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
May a municipality constitutionally place a limit on the size of contributions to committees formed to support or oppose ballot measures? We conclude that while the challenged legislation must be examined with great care, such a limit is constitutional because it serves compelling governmental interests without unduly infringing upon First Amendment rights. Although resolution of a conflict between fundamental interests such as these is never easy, in this instance the balance favors allowing government regulation.