![Carleton v. Tortosa](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Carleton v. Tortosa](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Carleton v. Tortosa
1993.CA.45798; 17 CAL. RPTR. 2D 734; 14 CAL. APP. 4TH 745
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
This case presents the question whether a real estate broker had a duty to advise her client that the clients real estate transactions could have adverse tax consequences.