![J. Lee Rankin v. Albert Shanker](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![J. Lee Rankin v. Albert Shanker](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
J. Lee Rankin v. Albert Shanker
NY.43323; 242 N.E.2d 802; 23 N.Y.2d 111 (1968)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
[23 N.Y.2d 111 Page 113] These appeals require us to pass upon a fundamental question of high importance in connection with the enforcement of the provisions of the recently enacted Taylor Law (L. 1967, ch. 392; Civil Service Law, art. 14, §§ 200-212). Are public employees or the unions which represent them entitled, as a matter of right, to trial by jury in a criminal contempt proceeding brought against them for alleged violation of section 210 (subd. 1) of that statute, in that (as to the employees) they engaged in a strike and (as to the organizations) they instigated, encouraged or condoned such strike?