J.M.K. 6, Inc. v. Gregg & Gregg, P.C. J.M.K. 6, Inc. v. Gregg & Gregg, P.C.

J.M.K. 6, Inc. v. Gregg & Gregg, P.C‪.‬

192 S.W.3D 189, 2006.TX.0002581

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

In this appeal, we decide (1) whether the Hughes tolling rule applies to certain third-party claims; (2) whether these third-party claims are "cross claims" subject to section 16.069 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code; and (3) whether the trial court erred in dismissing the third-party claims for contribution and indemnity. Because the Hughes rule does not extend the time for a client to file suit against his attorney if the attorney did not provide legal services in the prosecution or defense of a claim, we answer the first question in the negative. We further conclude that, although a third-party claim is not a "cross claim" within the scope of TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 16.069, the trial court erred in dismissing appellants third-party claims for contribution and indemnity. We therefore affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2006
28 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
32
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
71.9
KB

More Books by In the Supreme Court of Texas

King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman
2003
State v. Precision Solarcontrols State v. Precision Solarcontrols
2007
Bossier Chrysler-Dodge Ii, Inc. v. Rauschenberg Bossier Chrysler-Dodge Ii, Inc. v. Rauschenberg
2007
Cary v. Alford Cary v. Alford
2006
In re J.G In re J.G
1995
Insurance Company of The State of Pennsylvania v. Lejeune Insurance Company of The State of Pennsylvania v. Lejeune
2009