J. Ray Merkley v. John C. Beaslin

Plaintiff/appellant, J. Ray Merkley, appeals from a Summary judgment dismissing his malpractice action against defendant/respondent, John C. Beaslin. The trial court concluded that if respondent committed any legal malpractice, it occurred in 1976 when respondent drafted legal documents for the sale of a business for appellant, and, therefore, that Merkleys action was precluded by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.