![J. W. Teague v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![J. W. Teague v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
J. W. Teague v. State
TX.41445; 253 S.W.2d 276, 158 Tex. Crim. 83 (1952)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Appellant urges several grounds as to why the statement of facts should be considered notwithstanding the late filing. Among
these are that appellant's counsel forwarded the statement of facts to the district clerk, with a request that the approval
signature of the judge and the state's counsel be obtained; that when the clerk received the statement of facts, a file mark
was placed thereon which was well within the ninety-day period required for filing it.