![Jaime Ramon v. Boyd J. Farr](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jaime Ramon v. Boyd J. Farr](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jaime Ramon v. Boyd J. Farr
1989.UT.29, 770 P.2D 131, 101 UTAH ADV. REP. 48
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Plaintiffs Jose and Alicia Ramon, on behalf of their son, Jaime Ramon, appeal from a judgment rendered in a medical malpractice action upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant Dr. Boyd J. Farr. The Ramons claim that the trial court erred in refusing to give three jury instructions, including one that would have made the recommendations on a drug manufacturers package insert prima facie evidence of the applicable standard of care. We find no error in refusing the instructions and affirm.