James D. Riggs v. Linda L. Riggs

ON MOTION FOR REARGUMENT This 28th day of March, 1988, the Court has before it, the appellant's Motion for Reargument, which is unopposed. The documentary evidence attached to the Motion demonstrates that a Judge of the Family Court acknowledged receipt of the ""appeal papers"" from the appellant, set bond for the appeal and questioned its authority to provide further relief to the parties because the Family Court is divested of jurisdiction over a case while the matter is on appeal to this Court. See Moore v. Moore, Del. Supr., 144 A.2d 765, 767 (1958). Cf. Eller v. State, Del. Supr., 531 A.2d 951, 952 (1987).