![James E. Alm v. Aluminum Company America](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![James E. Alm v. Aluminum Company America](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
James E. Alm v. Aluminum Company America
1985.TX.40547; 687 S.W.2D 374
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
After considering Alms motion for rehearing, I have become convinced that (1) this court was wrong in holding the evidence is factually insufficient to support the jury findings of negligence and proximate cause against Alcoa and (2) Alms judgment against Alcoa should be affirmed.
More Books by Fourteenth District, Houston Court of Appeals of Texas
Larry Michael Hoffman v. State Texas
1994
Philip Woods Moore v. State Texas
1983
Harris County Bail Bond Board v. Carol Burns
1994
Charles L. Krull and Xavier Improvement Company v. Eduardo Somoza
1994
Michael King & Lydia King v. John O. Bishop
1994
Ronald Gaile Stephens v. Turtle Creek Apartments
1994