![James E. Oneil v. Meldrim Thomson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![James E. Oneil v. Meldrim Thomson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
James E. Oneil v. Meldrim Thomson
1974.NH.25 , 316 A.2D 168, 114 N.H. 155
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
The principal question raised on this appeal is whether a defendant convicted of violating the Uniform Narcotic Drug Law (N.J.S.A. 24:18-1 et seq.) may be punished as a second offender under N.J.S.A. 24:18-47(c)(2) when the second violation occurred, and the indictment based thereon was entered, prior to his first conviction under the act. We hold that he may not.