James R. Splettstosser Et Al. v. Robert L. Myer

Per Curiam ON MOTION FOR REHEARING The issue presented by this motion for rehearing requires the determination of the proper
test to be used when deciding if a suit is groundless pursuant to the Deceptive Trade Practices Consumers Protection Act,
Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. §§ 17.50(c) (Vernon 1987), (DTPA). The dispute in this case arose over the purchase of a house and approximately twelve acres of land in Caldwell County abutting
Walnut Creek. The respondent, Robert L. Myer, and Pam and Charles Cravens, (collectively referred to as "Meyer"), were shown
the property by petitioner, David Mozingo, a real estate agent in the employ of William Raymond Rouse, d/b/a/ Bill Rouse
Real Estate (collectively, "Rouse"). The owners of the land were petitioners James and Nila Splettstosser (Splettstosser).