![James Robert Haisley v. Robert James Grant](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![James Robert Haisley v. Robert James Grant](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
James Robert Haisley v. Robert James Grant
1971.AK.37, 486 P.2D 367
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court was correct in excluding opinion testimony as to the degree of appellee Grants intoxication at the time he drove his vehicle into the rear of appellants vehicle. We have concluded that the trial courts ruling was erroneous, and that this case should be remanded to the superior court for a new trial.