![James Thayer v. American Financial](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![James Thayer v. American Financial](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
James Thayer v. American Financial
MN.269 , 322 N.W.2d 599 (1982)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
1. Trial court's denial of motion for default judgment against respondents was not an abuse of discretion, but refusal to enter default judgments against defendants was error. 2. The arbitration clause did not express an intent on the part of the parties to arbitrate the issue of fraud in the inducement, nor did the language used in the agreement comprehend arbitration of that issue.