Ortiz v. Overland Express Ortiz v. Overland Express

Ortiz v. Overland Express

207 P.3d 1147, 146 N.M. 170, 2009 -NMCA- 041, NM.0000075(2009)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

OPINION {1} Worker's estate appeals from a compensation order awarding no compensation to the estate. The Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) concluded that Worker's use of methamphetamine and amphetamine was the sole cause of his death and benefits are therefore barred by NMSA 1978, § 52-1-12 (1989) of the Worker's Compensation Act (WCA). We hold that, as it relates to amphetamine and methamphetamine, this statutory defense was abolished by the Legislature in 1972. We also reject Employer's argument that benefits are barred because Worker was acting outside the course of his employment when he died and because Worker willfully suffered his death. We therefore reverse.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2009
26 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
23
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
69.5
KB

More Books by In the Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico

Akins v. United Steelworkers of America Akins v. United Steelworkers of America
2009
Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp. Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp.
2008
State v. Harrison State v. Harrison
2008
State v. Myers State v. Myers
2008
State v. Santiago State v. Santiago
2008
State v. Billington State v. Billington
2008