Paterson-Stocking v. Dunn Bros. Storage Paterson-Stocking v. Dunn Bros. Storage

Paterson-Stocking v. Dunn Bros. Storage

1937.MN.276, 276 N.W. 737, 201 MINN. 308

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

1. Upon the issue of whether the driver of a motor vehicle had the consent of the owner to operate the same at the time and place an accident occurred, any evidence tending to show the existence or extent of such consent is admissible, and a witness who heard the instructions of the owner, given to the operator at the time the latter took the motor vehicle, may testify as to what they were for the purpose of showing the extent of the consent given. Such instructions are not hearsay, but are part of the issue of consent and admissible as original evidence.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1937
3 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
65.2
KB

More Books by En Banc Supreme Court of Minnesota

James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation
1988
State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board
1985
Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault
1985
Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company
1985
Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul
1978
State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch
1989