![Salibra V. Supreme Court Of Ohio](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Salibra V. Supreme Court Of Ohio](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Salibra V. Supreme Court Of Ohio
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
This case involves a challenge to a rule of admission to the bar of the State of Ohio. Appellant Lawrence Salibra (Salibra) is an attorney, a member of the Wisconsin, Illinois and New York bars. He wishes to be admitted to practice law in Ohio without taking the Ohio Bar examination, but is precluded by a rule of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Salibra challenges the constitutionality of this rule on equal protection and right to travel grounds, asking for a declaratory judgment. The District Court dismissed his claim sua sponte under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, and we affirm.