![Salma v. Capon](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Salma v. Capon](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Salma v. Capon
74 CAL.RPTR.3D 873, 161 CAL.APP.4TH 1275, 2008 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 5108, 08 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 4181, 2008.CA.0003247
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
David Salma filed a cross-complaint against Daniel J. Capon which alleged, among other things, causes of action for conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Capon filed a special motion to strike these claims pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Before the trial court ruled on Capons motion, Salma filed an amended cross-complaint that revised the two claims. Capon filed a second motion to strike the amended claims. The court ultimately struck the conversion claim in the original cross-complaint pursuant to section 425.16 but did not strike the conversion claim in the amended cross-complaint or the intentional interference claims in either cross-complaint.