![Sandoval-Lua v. Gonzales](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Sandoval-Lua v. Gonzales](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Sandoval-Lua v. Gonzales
499 F.3D 1121, 2007.C09.0004237
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Victor Manuel Sandoval-Lua ("Lua") petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") decision affirming a final order of removal, seeking relief from conceded removability. The BIA affirmed the Immigration Judges ("IJ") decision finding Lua removable on the basis of his conviction for a controlled substance offense, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), and denied Luas application for cancellation of removal. The issue before us is whether Lua has carried his burden to demonstrate eligibility for cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). More precisely, we consider whether Lua has demonstrated that his prior state conviction under California Health & Safety Code § 11379(a) is not an "aggravated felony" as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B).