Sandra C. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite Sandra C. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite

Sandra C. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite

MN.440 , 326 N.W.2d 920 (1982)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

1. Exculpatory clauses are strictly construed against the party they benefit because they are not favored by the court and a clause that is ambiguous in scope or purports to release a person for intentional, willful or wanton acts is not enforceable. 2. Other jurisdictions have adopted a two-prong test for determining whether exculpatory clauses are invalid as contrary to public policy: (1) whether there was a disparity of bargaining power between the parties; and (2) the types of services being offered or provided.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1982
10 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
20
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
67.5
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982