Germain v. Mason

Mr. Wilson, in support of his motion, argued that as the writ of error described the defendant in the original suit as Jules Germain et al., the case fell within the ruling in Deneale v. Stump's Executors,1 * and similar subsequent cases, and that the writ should be dismissed. Mr. M. Blair, contra: The money judgment is against Germain alone. He singly can appeal.