Gertrude L. Brawner v. Pearl Assurance
1958.C09.355, 267 F.2D 45
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
In this case, this Court is again confronted with the confusion which follows the filing of motions for summary judgment by plaintiff and defendant, respectively. Again it is reiterated that such a situation does not parallel that where both parties file motions for directed verdict. In the latter instance, each party is held to agree that there is no disputed question of fact and that the case is to be decided on the principles of law. In contrast, by definition, a summary judgment cannot be granted if there be a disputed question of material fact. This determination does not depend upon what either or both parties may have though about the matter.