Gibson v. Tolbert Gibson v. Tolbert

Gibson v. Tolbert

102 S.W.3d 710, 2003.TX.0002281 , 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 532

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

James Tolbert is an indigent inmate who filed a pro se medical malpractice claim against Dr. Louis Gibson, a prison doctor who provided medical services to Tolbert. Tolbert asked the trial court to appoint counsel. The motion was never granted, and the trial court later dismissed the case. Tolbert appealed only the denial of appointed counsel. The court of appeals reversed the dismissal, holding that Tolberts civil suit was an "exceptional case" requiring appointed counsel. Without hearing oral argument, we reverse the court of appeals judgment and hold that an indigent inmate does not have a right to appointed counsel in a civil case merely because the inmates suit is against an employee of the prison in which the inmate is incarcerated.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
27 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
53.2
KB

More Books by Texas Supreme Court

Meeks v. Rosa Meeks v. Rosa
1999
Lopez v. Munoz Lopez v. Munoz
2000
Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Hutchison Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Hutchison
1999
PeÑA v. PeÑA PeÑA v. PeÑA
1999
Kroger Co. v. Robins Kroger Co. v. Robins
1999
Catterson v. Martin Catterson v. Martin
1999