Ilene Donawitz v. John J. Danek Et Al‪.‬

[42 N.Y.2d 138 Page 140] We are presented with yet another of the plethora of difficult questions which have arisen out of this court's holdings in Seider v Roth (17 N.Y.2d 111) and Simpson v Loehmann (21 N.Y.2d 305, mot for rearg den 21 N.Y.2d 990). For the first time this court has been asked to pass upon the propriety of extending this doctrine by allowing a Seider-Simpson jurisdictional attachment in a case involving a non-resident plaintiff and a nonresident defendant arising out of alleged acts of negligence which occurred in another State. In our view the doctrine explicated in Seider v Roth (supra) and Simpson v Loehmann (supra) should not be extended, but rather confined to the limits dictated by stare decisis.