![Karen C. Keen and Chuck D. Keen v. W.G.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Karen C. Keen and Chuck D. Keen v. W.G.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Karen C. Keen and Chuck D. Keen v. W.G.
1989.AK.240, 784 P.2D 653
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Appellant Chuck Keen is the defendant in a collection suit in Juneau. Appellee W.G. Ruddy, an attorney, represents the plaintiff in that suit. Chuck Keen and his wife, Karen, filed the instant action against Ruddy, alleging that Ruddys prosecution of the collection suit constitutes abuse of process, and seeking a declaration that Karen Keen owns 95% of a corporation that Ruddy sought to have sold for his clients benefit in the collection suit.