Kasper V. City Of Edmonds Kasper V. City Of Edmonds

Kasper V. City Of Edmonds

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

case and in a companion appeal, Thymian v. Massart, post p. 806, 420 P.2d 351 (1966), concerns the meaning of the words "total cost of the improvement" as they appear in the presently effective version of RCW 35.43.180, which provides for restraint of local improvement projects by protest of the owners of property within the proposed local improvement district. The problem is whether "total cost of the improvement" means the total cost of a project, including the amount proposed to be contributed from municipal funds, or whether it simply refers to the assessed cost as borne by the property owners whose property is specially benefited. Viewed from a slightly different vantage point, the basic issue is whether the legislature intended to allow a municipality to deprive property owners of their right of protest when the municipality involved proposes to provide, from one fund or another, more than 40 per cent of the amount required to finance the local improvement.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1966
17 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59.4
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Washington

Premo v. City of Renton Premo v. City of Renton
1994
Washington v. Dixon Washington v. Dixon
1994
Bronner v. Washington Bronner v. Washington
1994
Washington v. Silva-Baltazar Washington v. Silva-Baltazar
1994
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Farr Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Farr
1994
Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries
1994