Kate Greenwood and andrew Greenwood V.
1991.UT.216 , 817 P.2D 816, 169 UTAH ADV. REP. 6
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
HELD. - A finding not shown to be clearly erroneous would not be disturbed. The ordinance was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Greenwoods or on its face. The ordinance did not violate the equal protection clause by regulating vicious breeds more than other breeds that could also threaten public safety.