Kathios v. General Motors Corp.
C01.40025; 862 F.2d 944 (1988)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
SELYA, Circuit Judge This case offers food for thought in several senses of the phrase. Defendant says that plaintiff has had one bite of the apple and cannot take a second. Plaintiff contends that his initial bite was but a nibble, and that the fruit is not now forbidden. The district court found defendant's view of the prandial arrangements more palatable, and granted summary judgment accordingly. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND