Kay Louise Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Kay Louise Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance

Kay Louise Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance

1996.MN.19913 , 554 N.W.2D 733

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Appellant Kay Louise Stoebe raises the issue of whether respondent Merastar Insurance Companys offer of judgment, made pursuant to Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 68, but served fewer than ten days before the parties trial began, survived the commencement of trial. The district court held that Merastars offer of judgment did survive the commencement of trial, but the court of appeals reversed. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
31 October
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
10
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
64.4
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Powell v. S & G Prestress Co. Powell v. S & G Prestress Co.
1994
Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee
1994
State v. Legrande State v. Legrande
1968
Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
1968
Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority
1968
Bost v. Citizens National Bank Bost v. Citizens National Bank
1968