![Kaye v. Department of Licensing](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Kaye v. Department of Licensing](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Kaye v. Department of Licensing
1983.WA.41427 ; 659 P.2d 548; 34 Wash. App. 132
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Is the arresting officers sworn report (RCW 46.20.308(3)) admissible over objection in a de novo superior court hearing, as proof of the underlying facts which the Department of Licensing has the burden of proving in an implied consent appeal (RCW 46.20.334)? We hold it is not.
More Books by Division Two Court of Appeals of Washington
Vancouver School District No. 37 v. Service Employees International Union
1996
Herring v. Department of Social and Health Services
1996
In re Marriage of Dugan-Gaunt
1996
Mailloux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
1995
In re Marriage of Kastanas
1995
Willis v. Simpson Investment Co.
1995