![Kellar v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Kellar v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Kellar v. State
108 S.W.3d 311, 2003.TX.0004686
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
This case presents the issue whether, in an aggregated theft case, each separate theft must be specifically alleged in the charging instrument. We hold that, under Penal Code section 31.09, the indictment must allege only aggregation, not the specific acts of theft.