Kennedy v. Maxwell Kennedy v. Maxwell

Kennedy v. Maxwell

176 Ohio St. 215, 198 N.E.2d 658, OH.40136(1964)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Per Curiam. Petitioner contends that his plea of guilty was induced by promises of the prosecuting attorney, his own counsel and the court. The only evidence of such promises is the statement of the petitioner. The promise, according to petitioner's own statement, was that he would be put on probation, which he was, and the probation was revoked only as a result of his own acts.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1964
6 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
50.8
KB

More Books by The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati
1987
Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli
1987
Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth. Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth.
1953
In re Pottery In re Pottery
1954
State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
2004
State v. Doe State v. Doe
2004