![Kennedy v. Maxwell](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Kennedy v. Maxwell](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Kennedy v. Maxwell
176 Ohio St. 215, 198 N.E.2d 658, OH.40136(1964)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Per Curiam. Petitioner contends that his plea of guilty was induced by promises of the prosecuting attorney, his own counsel and the court. The only evidence of such promises is the statement of the petitioner. The promise, according to petitioner's own statement, was that he would be put on probation, which he was, and the probation was revoked only as a result of his own acts.