Ketchum v. Duncan. Hays v. Ketchum Ketchum v. Duncan. Hays v. Ketchum

Ketchum v. Duncan. Hays v. Ketchum

96 U.S. 659, 1877.SCT.0000194

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The principal question attempted to be raised by the appellants is, whether the deed of trust or mortgage of the railroad company, executed in 1853, is a valid security, not merely for the bonds therein described, but for the interest-coupons that fell due in May and November, 1874, and which are now held by Alexander Duncan. Assuming that the question is properly before us, we proceed directly to consider it. On the part of the appellants, it is claimed that the coupons were paid when they became due, or, secondly, if not, that Duncan, Sherman, & Co., and their assignee, Alexander Duncan, are estopped by fraud and breach of trust from setting them up as first mortgage liens, that is, as entitled to the benefit of the lien of the mortgage of 1853; and, thirdly, that the coupons, if not paid when they fell due, have since been paid to Duncan, Sherman, & Co., under a special appropriation of the net earnings of the railroad, which the firm diverted to other uses. This, it is said, appears from a proper marshalling of the assets of the railroad company. On the other hand, Alexander Duncan, who obtained those coupons from Duncan, Sherman, & Co., denies that they were paid when they fell due, or have ever been paid. He denies that there is any estoppel, arising from fraud or breach of trust, against claiming the coupons to be entitled to the lien of the first mortgage. And he denies that there has been any misappropriation of the net earnings of the railroad company, which, under any proper marshalling of the assets, shows that the coupons were paid to the firm from which he obtained them. He insists that the coupons, instead of having been paid, became the property of Duncan, Sherman, & Co., either by purchase or transfer from the former owners, at or about the times when they fell due, and that he has succeeded to the rights of those purchasers. It is to the support of one or the other of these opposite averments of the parties that most of the evidence in this voluminous record has been directed.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1877
1 October
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
26
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
69.4
KB

More Books by United States Supreme Court

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure, Appellate Procedure and Bankruptcy Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure, Appellate Procedure and Bankruptcy Procedure 2023
2023