Ketterson v. Wolf Ketterson v. Wolf

Ketterson v. Wolf

892 A.2d 1084, 2006.DE.0000034

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Submitted: November 28, 2005 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices ORDER This 24th day of January 2006, the Court has considered the appellees' motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds it manifest on the face of the appellant's opening brief that the appeal is without merit for the reasons stated by the Court of Chancery in its decision dated July 18, 2005. We find no error or abuse of discretion on the part of the Court of Chancery in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellees' motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2006
24 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
50.8
KB

More Books by In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware

Epstein v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Epstein v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
2001
Gilliard-Belfast v. Wendy's Inc. Gilliard-Belfast v. Wendy's Inc.
2000
Abbott v. Morin Abbott v. Morin
2006
Eley v. State Eley v. State
2005
Ramunno v. Faraone Ramunno v. Faraone
2006
In re Petition of Perkins, No. 419 In re Petition of Perkins, No. 419
2005