Permanently Reviving the Temporary Insider. Permanently Reviving the Temporary Insider.

Permanently Reviving the Temporary Insider‪.‬

The Journal of Corporation Law 2011, Wntr, 36, 2

The Journal of Corporation Law
    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

I. INTRODUCTION It is a sensible time to reevaluate insider trading law because big things are happening. In the ongoing Galleon insider trading proceedings, the SEC and the Department of Justice are prosecuting perhaps the biggest insider trading scandal in history. (1) The federal government has also recently brought unprecedented charges involving new instruments (credit default swaps), (2) new theories (18 U.S.C. [section] 1348), (3) and new defendants (employers). (4) Recent defendants range from famous billionaires, (5) to administrative assistants, (6) to foreign nationals working on Wall Street. (7) Cross-national cooperation among securities enforcers pursuing insider trading cases has never been higher. (8) Government regulators around the world seem to believe unanimously that insider trading must be blunted, and foreign governments are bringing unprecedented insider trading prosecutions. (9)

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2011
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
112
Pages
PUBLISHER
University of Iowa Journal of Corporation Law
SIZE
409.6
KB

More Books by The Journal of Corporation Law

Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment After the Dubai Ports Controversy: Has the U.S. Government Finally Figured out How to Balance Foreign Threats to National Security Without Alienating Foreign Companies? Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment After the Dubai Ports Controversy: Has the U.S. Government Finally Figured out How to Balance Foreign Threats to National Security Without Alienating Foreign Companies?
Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment After the Dubai Ports Controversy: Has the U.S. Government Finally Figured out How to Balance Foreign Threats to National Security Without Alienating Foreign Companies?
2008
Commentary on "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance" by Leo E. Strine, Jr (Response to Article in This Issue, P. 1) Commentary on "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance" by Leo E. Strine, Jr (Response to Article in This Issue, P. 1)
Commentary on "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance" by Leo E. Strine, Jr (Response to Article in This Issue, P. 1)
2007
Commentary on Leo Strine's "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance". (Article by Leo E. Strine Jr. In This Issue, P. 1) Commentary on Leo Strine's "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance". (Article by Leo E. Strine Jr. In This Issue, P. 1)
Commentary on Leo Strine's "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance". (Article by Leo E. Strine Jr. In This Issue, P. 1)
2007
Conclusion. (The Mutual Fund Distribution Expense Mess) Conclusion. (The Mutual Fund Distribution Expense Mess)
Conclusion. (The Mutual Fund Distribution Expense Mess)
2007
Insider Trading Laws and Stock Markets Around the World: An Empirical Contribution to the Theoretical Law and Economics Debate. Insider Trading Laws and Stock Markets Around the World: An Empirical Contribution to the Theoretical Law and Economics Debate.
Insider Trading Laws and Stock Markets Around the World: An Empirical Contribution to the Theoretical Law and Economics Debate.
2007
Myths About Mutual Fund Fees: Economic Insights on Jones V. Harris. Myths About Mutual Fund Fees: Economic Insights on Jones V. Harris.
Myths About Mutual Fund Fees: Economic Insights on Jones V. Harris.
2010